Written by
Client details are withheld. No names, figures, addresses or card numbers from the client’s documents appear in this account.
The client lives and works in Japan and was preparing a Singapore citizenship application. He uploaded ten files, about thirteen pages, and asked for a quote for notarised English translations. Three files were year-end withholding tax slips for 2023, 2024 and 2025. Three were local tax payment certificates and two were local tax assessment certificates, labelled by fiscal year. The last two were residence cards, his own and a family member’s.
Japanese tax records for Singapore citizenship look repetitive: the same kinds of document, year after year. The difficulty is that they come from two different issuers, measure two different taxes and use two different ways of counting years. A translation that blurs those differences produces a bundle in which the years appear not to line up.
The year-end withholding slip is issued by the employer. It summarises a calendar year’s salary, the income tax withheld and certain deductions. It is the document most salaried people in Japan have, because their income tax is settled through the employer rather than by filing their own return.
The resident tax certificates come from the municipality, not the employer. One kind shows the assessment, the other confirms payment. Japanese resident tax is generally calculated on the previous year’s income, so a certificate labelled for one fiscal year usually reflects income earned in the calendar year before it.
That single fact explains why a bundle like this can confuse a reader. The 2024 withholding slip and the 2025 resident tax certificate describe the same year’s income from two angles. A translation must keep each document’s own year labels exactly as printed, so an officer can see the relationship rather than suspect a gap or an overlap.
Japanese official documents often date themselves by imperial era. The current era began in 2019, so its seventh year is 2025. Our approach is to give the era date as printed and the Western year in brackets, every time, so the reader never has to convert. Fiscal-year labels are translated as fiscal years, never silently turned into calendar years.
Amounts stay in yen, exactly as printed. No conversion to Singapore dollars appears in a certified translation.
Because the bundle repeats the same document types across three years, consistency is half the work:
An officer comparing three years of slips should be able to put them side by side and see the same structure in each.
For the language side of jobs like this, our Japanese to English translators in Singapore handle tax, civil and corporate records.
Two of the files were Japanese residence cards. A card is translated label by label, with the status of residence, period of stay and card details reproduced exactly, and any annotations on the reverse translated as written. Personal details of the family member are translated as they appear on that person’s card and nowhere else.
The client asked for notarisation, a common choice for ICA applications. ICA’s published guidance on translations recognises translations notarised by a notary public in Singapore or in the country that issued the document, alongside embassy translations and embassy-attested private translations. The form also offered “ICA” as a certification type, which does not exist; ICA states that it does not endorse any private translation company.
Notarisation is attached document by document. Ten files can mean ten notarised translations unless the client and the receiving authority are content with a bundled approach, and that affects cost more than the page count does. We set that out before quoting.
Our page on document translation for ICA applications covers the wider set of records ICA files usually contain.
The client asked for a quote and received a scope that explained his own bundle back to him: which documents came from his employer, which from his city office, and why the years on them would not match one for one. Nothing had been translated at the enquiry stage.
A bundle prepared this way is easier for us to translate consistently and easier for an officer to read, because every document sits in a clear place in the story of three years’ work and tax.
Japanese resident tax is generally assessed on the previous year’s income. The translation keeps the labels exactly as printed so the relationship is clear.
It gives the era date as printed and the Western year in brackets.
No. Figures stay exactly as printed.
Usually, yes. Notarisation is attached to each translated document.
Yes, if you submit it. It is translated as issued, like any other document in the bundle.
Each withholding slip names the employer that issued it. Each name is translated consistently, so the change is visible and clearly explained by the documents themselves.
If you are preparing Japanese records for a Singapore application, send them to us for a scoped quote and we will group them before pricing.
Our team has been helping people in Singapore with document translation since 2003. We work with certificates, legal papers, ICA documents, and more. Every blog you read here is written by our in-house experts who handle these documents every single day. We share simple, useful guides to help you make the right choices.
View all posts by Singapore TranslatorsMore insights from our translation experts
Client details are withheld. The client is not named, and nothing from the police document…